Form of Agreement for Extension of Term in Contracts Dependent on Legal Validity
Abstract
Pursuant to Article 2 of the Turkish Code of Obligations No. 6098, even if the second degree points are not agreed upon by the parties, the contract is validly concluded in this case. The determination of the time of performance of the obligation by the parties in the contract is not accepted by the legislator as an essential point. In the event that the time of performance is subsequently determined under the contract or the agreed period is extended after the conclusion of the contract, the issue of form is important. In the event that this issue, which was not agreed upon at the time of the signing of the contract and left in a legal gap, is subsequently determined by the ‘postponement agreement’, there is a hesitation as to which form should be subject to the subsequent determination of the time of performance in contracts for which the validity form is stipulated in the law in accordance with Article 13 of the TCO. There is no unity in the doctrine and jurisprudence on this issue; the purpose of our study is to eliminate the hesitations experienced especially in the application of construction agreements in return for land shares signed in official form
Abstract (Turkish)
The text below is taken from the introduction to the study.
Türk Borçlar Kanunu’nun “İkinci derecedeki noktalar” başlıklı m. 2 hükmünce taraflar sözleşmenin esaslı noktalarında uyuşmuşlarsa, ikinci derecedeki noktalar üzerinde durulmamış olsa bile, sözleşme kurulmuş sayılır. İkinci dereceden noktalar sözleşme özgürlüğünce taraflarca belirlenmemiş olsa bile bu durum, sözleşmenin geçerliliğini etkilemese de işin özelliği gereğince kanunen şekle bağlanmış sözleşmelerde ifa zamanının saptanması önem taşımakta ve böylece sübjektif esaslı nokta olarak sözleşmede borcun ifa edileceği sürenin veya anın belirlendiği görülmektedir. Araştırmamızın konusu, TBK m. 12 hükmünce geçerlilik şekline bağlı sözleşmelerde sözleşme kurulduktan sonra ifa zamanının ayrıca saptanması veya (TBK m. 95 hükmünce) mevcut sözleşme hükmünde değişiklik yapılması halinde süre uzatım anlaşmalarının, TBK m. 3004 Kanunen Geçerlilik Şekline Bağlı Sözleşmelerde Sürenin Uzatılmasına Yö
The full text is in Turkish.
Related articles
-
April 2026
Tenants' Responsibility for Contributing to General Expenses and Advance Payments in Condominium Property
-
7 June 2024
Contractor's Acquisition Transactions Regarding the Right to Receivables Arising from the Construction Contract in Return for Land Share
-
20 March 2024
Effect of Change or Cancellation in Development Plan on Construction Contract in Exchange for Work and Land Share
-
2017
Criticism of the Exorbitantly Errored Decision of the Constitutional Court Regarding the Application of Faik Tari and Sultan Tari with Application No. 2014/12321
Publication details
| Authors | Prof. Dr. Etem Sabâ Özmen, Doç. Dr. Müge Ürem |
|---|---|
| Published in | Armağan |
| Date | October 2025 |
| Pages | 24 |
| Subjects | Contract Law |